[csw-maintainers] ITP: opencsw-policy

[Philip Brown]

On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 7:16 PM, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Excerpts from Peter FELECAN's message of Sat Jan 01 06:13:21 -0500 2011:
>
>> Docbook or even html as proposed by Phil is still SGML. Even with
>> the highly configurable Emacs it's a real PITA. Consequently, my
>> vote goes for asciidoc.
>
> The source of asciidoc is certainly more human readable too (it looks
> less like markup), so I'm ok with that.  +1 for asciidoc.  Anyone
> else?


I'm not familiar with asciidoc.
Rather than having to take peoples word for [how language xyz looks],
how about we put up some sample pages, with a medium (or possibly even
high) complexity "sample document", in (abbreviated)HTML, asciidoc,
and whatever else people would like to propose?
Lets have people actually LOOK AT what they are deciding about, before
they make decisions.

Both the 'working code', and how the resulting output looks.