[csw-maintainers] Dependencies on SUNW packages (was: newpkgs libslp1, openslp_devel)

[Peter FELECAN]

"Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski" <maciej at opencsw.org> writes:

> Let's sum it up.  If I understand correctly, permission to depend on
> openslp has not been granted.  Instead, we can declare a dependency on
> SUNWslpu.  It will not result in automatic installation of libslp, but
> will display a message during package installation, that SUNWslpu is
> missing.  The 64-bit libslp is in differently named packages between
> Solaris 9 and 10, which could be potentially be a showstopper.
> However, in the case of cups, because (by coincidence) there are no
> 64-bit cups libraries, we don't need to declare a dependency providing
> the 64-bit libslp.  Therefore, we'll declare a dependency on SUNWslpu
> until 64-bit cups libraries come along.  We'll revisit the issue then.
>
> Is that the result of our discussion?

Not really. There were 4 people (you, Ben, Peter Bonivart and myself)
agreeing with a Open CSW package for openslp. Phil is against. My
interpretation is exactly the reverse of your summary. Anyhow, if you
changed your mind I don't have a thing to say.
-- 
Peter