[csw-maintainers] Unifying cvs and cvs_feature?

[Dagobert Michelsen]

Hi Phil,

Am 17.01.2011 um 19:28 schrieb Philip Brown:
> Okay, sounds like good reason for unifying. Looks like main original
> cvs hasnt been updated for over two years.
> 
> That being said, I'd like to suggest one change.
> Rather than forcing the cvs_feature symlink into the cvs package, I'd
> suggest you update the cvs_feature package, to depend on new CVS, and
> deliver the symlink.
> That way the "cvs" package is more clean.

I already implemented it exactly this way :-)
Submitting it then.


Best regards

  -- Dago

> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 4:02 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> ....
>> It sounds to me that "cvs stable" is long outdated and of no practical
>> use as all fixes go to "feature".
>> 
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> maintainers mailing list
> maintainers at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
> .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.