[csw-maintainers] Unifying cvs and cvs_feature?

[Philip Brown]

Okay, sounds like good reason for unifying. Looks like main original
cvs hasnt been updated for over two years.


That being said, I'd like to suggest one change.
Rather than forcing the cvs_feature symlink into the cvs package, I'd
suggest you update the cvs_feature package, to depend on new CVS, and
deliver the symlink.
That way the "cvs" package is more clean.



On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 4:02 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> ....
> It sounds to me that "cvs stable" is long outdated and of no practical
> use as all fixes go to "feature".
>
>