[csw-maintainers] [csw-pkgsubmissions] yaz

[Dagobert Michelsen]

Hi Phil,

Am 18.01.2011 um 19:05 schrieb Philip Brown:
> On 1/18/11, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> Hi Phil,
>> 
>> Am 07.01.2011 um 16:34 schrieb Dagobert Michelsen:
>>> Am 07.01.2011 um 16:28 schrieb Philip Brown:
>>>> Errrr.... Almost all of the listed packages, are missing from newpkgs.
>>> 
>>> Strange, pushed again.
>> 
>> "yaz" has still not been released. I repushed again. Please verify
>> that it reaches the mirrors.
> 
> Sorry, I had set yaz aside, and forgotten about it. I THOUGHT I had
> emailed the list, but dont see it. maybe I forgot to send :-(
> 
> There's a whole bunch of incorrect references to  /usr/local in the
> manpages, etc.
> I think these are not trivial examples, but "this is where you
> configure yaz" type docs.
> How about cleaning them up?

Phil, your constant nagging about documentation is a real PITA.
Fixing these takes an amount of time (probably on every release)
which has no resemblance to the main package. We have A TON of
really outdated, not packaged PRIO-1 stuff. Do you really think
we should focus on documentation instead of having e.g. an updated
Kerberos or PHP? Fixing doc issues in all packages takes a regular
amount of time in terms of *hours* I don't have for version
bumps. For a 100% package we should fix it, right. But we are not
at 99%. Or 95%. Or even 90%. We are more at 75%. Focusing on
docs is IMHO the wrong priority.


Best regards

  -- Dago