[csw-maintainers] amendments and issues with recent prop

[rupert THURNER]

On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 16:50, Jonathan Craig <jcraig at opencsw.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Jonathan Craig <jcraig at opencsw.org>
> wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > How does the adjusted vote, as I proposed, impeed "progress"?
> > It seems as though the mechanisms, while nearly completely, still have
> > a week or two worth of tweaks to make it fully live(?)
> > During that time, we could discuss, in parallel, what kind of reviews
> > other people may want.
> > Or, if no-one else voted for the reviews. just have peace and quiet :)
>
> If you split the vote across a number of choices then we will end up
> with no clear direction.  Your trying to ride the coattails of the
> automated release proposal and unfairly disrupting that decision.  You
> need to get out of the way of the first proposal and begin work on
> your own proposal.  If you had done this to begin with you wouldn't
> have lost the last week to arguments with the automated release
> process.
>

if you want to have a fair result even if you have similar possibilities in
the selection, one might consider the debian method of voting,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloneproof_Schwartz_Sequential_Dropping.

otherwise opencsw will be called thunderbay, not lakehead :)

rupert.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20110701/1b370158/attachment.html>