[csw-maintainers] experimental: subversion --> git, mercurial

rupert THURNER rupert at opencsw.org
Sun Jun 26 22:00:40 CEST 2011


On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 20:03, Sebastian Kayser <skayser at opencsw.org> wrote:

> * Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
> > Excerpts from Sebastian Kayser's message of Sun Jun 26 10:47:57 -0400
> 2011:
> >
> > > The operations above are one off, right? To add some further
> > > figures, a git clone of the full repo takes ~2mins for me, git log
> > > . in a package directory ~12 seconds.
> >
> > The initial price of a clone will be the heaviest as only new
> > references are transferred after that.  2 minutes isn't that bad for a
> > large repo like the package tree.
>
> Sorry, I'll have to revert my 2 minute clone estimate, that was on my
> vserver with a very thick uplink. Re-tried on my home server (~100
> KiB/s), clone took about 20mins. :/
>
> > Was the log operation on a local or network mounted filesystem?  What
> > about a subsequent run of the same operation (cold vs hot cache)?
>
> Local file system, same result on subsequent runs (git 1.4.4.4). On my
> server at home (git 1.7.5.4) the log operation on a directory is faster
> and takes ~2 seconds (both for initial and subsequent runs).
>
> started http://wiki.opencsw.org/dvcs.

rupert
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20110626/8bfa9f8f/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the maintainers mailing list