[csw-maintainers] the future of pkg-get...

Juraj Lutter juraj at lutter.sk
Thu Sep 8 13:49:34 CEST 2011


  

I would go with alternatives. It's elegant and "systematic"
approach. 

On 08.09.2011 12:46, Ben Walton wrote: 

> If we use
alternatives, presumably we'd set the deprecated version as higher
priority. Sites would then need to change scripts or run a command to
switch the alternative.
> 
> I think the key its that whatever we choose
needs to be advertised well...and well in advance of delivering the new
package.
> 
> Thanks
> -Ben

-- 
Juraj Lutter | / ASCII Ribbon
Campaign
otis (at) wilbury (dot) sk | / - NO HTML/RTF in
e-mail
http://www.wilbury.sk/ | / - NO Word docs in e-mail
JID: otis
(at) jabber (dot) vx (dot) sk
!07/11 PDP a ni deppart m'I !pleH
  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20110908/78306c92/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the maintainers mailing list