[csw-maintainers] Proposal: direct binding for all the opencsw software stack

[Dagobert Michelsen]

Hi Jörg,

Am 27.08.2012 um 12:29 schrieb Joerg.Schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de (Joerg Schilling):
> Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> Excerpts from Yann Rouillard's message of Sat Aug 25 11:10:57 -0400 2012:
>>> For 2., I don't know yet. I would like some input from Dago on the
>>> best way to add distribution wide LDFLAGS while still allowing to
>>> override them.  I was thinking about adding a COMMON_LDFLAGS mgar
>>> variable that could easily be overriden in the Makefile.
>> 
>> What about:
>> 
>> bwalton @ unstable10s : ~/opencsw/.buildsys/v2
>> $ svn diff
>> Index: gar.conf.mk
>> ===================================================================
>> --- gar.conf.mk (revision 19080)
>> +++ gar.conf.mk (working copy)
>> @@ -706,7 +706,7 @@
>> CFLAGS   ?= $(strip $($(GARCOMPILER)_CC_FLAGS) $(_CATEGORY_CFLAGS)
>> $(EXTRA_CFLAGS))
>> CXXFLAGS ?= $(strip $($(GARCOMPILER)_CXX_FLAGS) $(_CATEGORY_CXXFLAGS)
>> $(EXTRA_CXXFLAGS))
>> CPPFLAGS ?= $(strip $($(GARCOMPILER)_CPP_FLAGS) $(_CATEGORY_CPPFLAGS)
>> $(EXTRA_CPPFLAGS) $(INCLUDE_FLAGS))
>> -LDFLAGS  ?= $(strip $($(GARCOMPILER)_LD_FLAGS) $(_CATEGORY_LDFLAGS)
>> $(EXTRA_LDFLAGS) $(LINKER_FLAGS))
>> +LDFLAGS  ?= $(strip $($(GARCOMPILER)_LD_FLAGS) $(_CATEGORY_LDFLAGS)
> 
> I hope, you only use LDFLAGS in case of a known defective upstream build 
> system. Note that using LDFLAGS may cause a sane build system to misbehave.

I think you mean LD_OPTIONS to misbehave and LDFLAGS is ok?


Best regards

  -- Dago

-- 
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2351 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20120827/d7e71ed7/attachment.p7s>