[csw-maintainers] Python 2.7

[Yann Rouillard]

Nice summary !
Seems like it sounds the end of the longest opencsw thread ever ! :)

BTW, even I would still prefer the CSWpy27- prefix (for the reason I
mentioned), I am not in the "over my dead body" mode for that and the
proposed layout is ok for me, so please, follow the rough consensus.

What's is still (and maybe more) important is that our users know what to
except and they are clearly informed in advance when we will drop python
2.6.

Yann


2013/8/2 Maciej (Matchek) Bliziński <maciej at opencsw.org>

> 2013/8/2 Peter FELECAN <pfelecan at opencsw.org>:
> > Oh, I'm so sorry, I just read the reverse of what you mean. Indeed, we
> > agreed on that. Sorry again., maybe I should restrain when the
> > temperature is more than 32 Celsius.
>
> It can be confusing, I know! We have a 90 message long thread and
> we're agreeing! ;-)
>
> Tu sum up:
>
> Peter and I have a rough consensus how to go forward. Dagobert doesn't
> like the 2.6+2.7 packages idea. Yann would prefer the CSWpy27- prefix.
> One undecided thing is if it's okay for the Python modules to drop the
> dependency on the interpreter(s).
>
> I see how the 2.6+2.7 packages are ugly but I think they're a decent
> pragmatic choice. It's true that the upgrade can be done with a small
> shell script on each system, but requiring all users to run this makes
> our package catalog harder to use, and I'm sure we would be getting
> emails from people having problems. If we ship the dual packages,
> things will just work.
>
> Maciej
> _______________________________________________
> maintainers mailing list
> maintainers at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
> .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20130802/830017c6/attachment-0001.html>