[csw-maintainers] Our infrastructure on Solaris 9

[Laurent Blume]

On 06/08/13 18:04, James Lee wrote:
> The current OpenCSW Solaris 9 packages are both newer and more numerous
> than the Companion CD's.

True.

> You are not disagreeing with me.  I'm not saying what Solaris 9 users
> want.  I'm only saying what I want and making my recommendation to
> OpenCSW which isn't to work as unpaid slaves for people running obsolete
> operating systems.
>
> I did say Solaris 9 users would prefer [more satisfied, not satisfied]
> working old packages to none [non-working] but that's basic logic as
> those not liking old can choose not to take the offer so making it no
> worse than none.

Okay, so it's indeed complementary, my suggestion only adding the hoop 
they'd need to jump through if they /really/ want an update (if such a 
hoop can be found).

Thanks,

Laurent