[csw-maintainers] checkpkg signals a misterious dependency for TeXLive and it's right

[Dagobert Michelsen]

Hi Peter,

Am 14.02.2013 um 10:43 schrieb pfelecan <pfelecan at opencsw.org>:

> TeXLive has many packages. One of them is
> texlive_latex_extra_binaries, which contains architecturally
> dependent files and some symbolic links toward them; the
> texlive_common is a package containing only architecturally
> neutral files and is the result of the "reminder" files, i.e.,
> everything not in specific packages is in it...
> 
> However, I get:
> 
> RUNTIME_DEP_PKGS_CSWtexlive-common += CSWtexlive-latex-extra-binaries
> If any of the reported errors were false positives, you can override them
> pasting the lines below to the GAR recipe.
> CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWtexlive-common += missing-dependency|CSWtexlive-latex-extra-binaries
> 
> Dependency issues of CSWtexlive-common:
> CSWtexlive-latex-extra-binaries is needed by CSWtexlive-common, because:
> - symlink contains a CSWtexlive-common (u'/opt/csw/bin/bg5+latex') which
> needs the target file: '/opt/csw/bin/gbklatex'.
> - symlink contains a CSWtexlive-common (u'/opt/csw/bin/bg5+pdflatex')
> which needs the target file: '/opt/csw/bin/gbkpdflatex'.
> RUNTIME_DEP_PKGS_CSWtexlive-common += CSWtexlive-latex-extra-binaries
> 
> But the incriminated files are all part of the
> texlive_latex_extra_binaries:
> 
> PKGFILES_CSWtexlive-latex-extra-binaries        +=    /opt/csw/bin/bg5+latex
> PKGFILES_CSWtexlive-latex-extra-binaries        +=    /opt/csw/bin/bg5+pdflatex
> PKGFILES_CSWtexlive-latex-extra-binaries        +=    /opt/csw/bin/gbklatex
> PKGFILES_CSWtexlive-latex-extra-binaries        +=    /opt/csw/bin/gbkpdflatex
> 
> Effectively, we have in the texlive_comon prototype:
> 
> s none /opt/csw/bin/bg5+latex=gbklatex
> s none /opt/csw/bin/bg5+pdflatex=gbkpdflatex
> 
> and in the texlive_latex_extra_binaries the symbolic links are missing.
> 
> From whichever point I look at the recipe,
> http://gar.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/gar/csw/mgar/pkg/texlive/trunk/Makefile,
> this stays a mystery for me. The only cue is that checkpkg is right and mgar wrong...

The arguments of PKGFILES are regexes, try \+ instead of +.

Best regards

  -- Dago