chkpkg and soname-unused

Dagobert Michelsen dam at opencsw.org
Mon Nov 4 17:44:09 CET 2013


Hi Rafi,

Am 04.11.2013 um 17:41 schrieb Rafael Ostertag <raos at opencsw.org>:
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 05:15:31PM +0100, slowfranklin wrote:
>> Hi Rafi
>> 
>> Am 04.11.2013 um 16:50 schrieb Rafael Ostertag <raos at opencsw.org>:
>>> I recently got complains from chkpkg about soname-unused on sparc. The same
>>> build recipes do not make chkpkg complain on i386. As far as I can tell, `-z
>>> ignore' is in LD_OPTIONS on both, sparc and i386.
>> 
>> oh, so I?m not the only one!
> 
> Nah ;)
> 
>> 
>> I wanted to do a simple minor version bump of tracker when I ran into this. I?m currently adding a lot of GARCH dependent overrides in order to work around this becausei I gave up figurin out the cause after 8 hours.
>> According to elfdump -d the unused libs are definitely linked into the resulting program/library even though no symbol is used as verified with nm -d.
>> 
>>> Any ideas what's going on?
>> 
>> No.
> 
> Could it be related to the buildfarm update?


Probably, the T5220 is now running 105400-04 whereas unstable10x is still running 147441-19.
Should I update the x86 machines also? My impression is to patch as less as possible to
not introduce new linker symbol anomalies. The patch on the farm was needed to fix an ugly
bug in zfs which prevented us from doing backups, so no option of not installing ;-)


Best regards

  -- Dago

-- 
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2351 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20131104/0db0d0af/attachment-0001.p7s>


More information about the maintainers mailing list