chkpkg and soname-unused

[Rafael Ostertag]

Hi Yann

On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 06:10:30PM +0100, Yann Rouillard wrote:
> Hi Rafi and slowfranklin,
> 
> Tell me how to reproduce the problem and I will have a look (for
> slowfranklin, I suppose I just have to recompile tracker).
> I am surprised that a patch could have such a bad side effect as screwing
> the "-z ignore option" and I would prefer to dig first into the problem.

You can take `gamin'. Remove both CHKPKG_OVERRIDES for CSWgamin and build a
package on sparc and x86. That should do the trick. Let me know if I can be of
assistance.

cheers
rafi

> 
> Yann
> 
> 
> 2013/11/4 Rafael Ostertag <raos at opencsw.org>
> 
> > Hi Dago
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 05:44:09PM +0100, Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
> > > Hi Rafi,
> > >
> > > > Could it be related to the buildfarm update?
> > >
> > >
> > > Probably, the T5220 is now running 105400-04 whereas unstable10x is
> > still running 147441-19.
> > > Should I update the x86 machines also? My impression is to patch as less
> > as possible to
> > > not introduce new linker symbol anomalies. The patch on the farm was
> > needed to fix an ugly
> > > bug in zfs which prevented us from doing backups, so no option of not
> > installing ;-)
> >
> > If it is related to Solaris patches, patching x86 would mean that `-z
> > ignore'
> > might not work on x86 anymore, as well. So, wouldn't it be smarter, to
> > figure
> > out why it stopped working on sparc? I mean, -z ignore ain't such an
> > esotheric
> > switch and has been put in place for good reasons, hasn't it?
> >
> > cheers
> > rafi
> >