chkpkg and soname-unused

[Yann Rouillard]

Ok, it seems that this is caused by a recent patch, 147147-26, which
changed the behaviour of the "-z ignore" option.
Indeed the changelog contains the following line:
    7051963 ld's -z ignore processing is too simplistic

I opened a bug on Oracle support to have more information, meanwhile I will
disable the check so everybody doesn't have to add overrides for this
problem. The messages about soname-unused will still be printed for
information but they will not cause an error in the packaging process.

So you can "mgar update" and remove the overrides on tracker and gamin.

Yann



2013/11/4 Yann Rouillard <yann at pleiades.fr.eu.org>

> Hmm, that's really strange.
> The linker detects that the library is not required but still keeps it.
> It doesn't happen for every library. I added -lssl on the command line and
> the libssl library was properly removed from the dependencies.
>
> The debug messages from ld are:
>
> debug: file=libnsl.so.1  unused: does not satisfy any references;
> retained: compensating for insufficient dependencies
> debug: file=libintl.so.8  unused: does not satisfy any references;
> retained: compensating for insufficient dependencies
> debug: file=libssl.so.1.0.0  unused: does not satisfy any references;
> discarded
>
> I am still looking for the reason.
>
> Yann
>
>
>
> 2013/11/4 Rafael Ostertag <raos at opencsw.org>
>
>> Hi Yann
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 06:10:30PM +0100, Yann Rouillard wrote:
>> > Hi Rafi and slowfranklin,
>> >
>> > Tell me how to reproduce the problem and I will have a look (for
>> > slowfranklin, I suppose I just have to recompile tracker).
>> > I am surprised that a patch could have such a bad side effect as
>> screwing
>> > the "-z ignore option" and I would prefer to dig first into the problem.
>>
>> You can take `gamin'. Remove both CHKPKG_OVERRIDES for CSWgamin and build
>> a
>> package on sparc and x86. That should do the trick. Let me know if I can
>> be of
>> assistance.
>>
>> cheers
>> rafi
>>
>> >
>> > Yann
>> >
>> >
>> > 2013/11/4 Rafael Ostertag <raos at opencsw.org>
>> >
>> > > Hi Dago
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 05:44:09PM +0100, Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
>> > > > Hi Rafi,
>> > > >
>> > > > > Could it be related to the buildfarm update?
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Probably, the T5220 is now running 105400-04 whereas unstable10x is
>> > > still running 147441-19.
>> > > > Should I update the x86 machines also? My impression is to patch as
>> less
>> > > as possible to
>> > > > not introduce new linker symbol anomalies. The patch on the farm was
>> > > needed to fix an ugly
>> > > > bug in zfs which prevented us from doing backups, so no option of
>> not
>> > > installing ;-)
>> > >
>> > > If it is related to Solaris patches, patching x86 would mean that `-z
>> > > ignore'
>> > > might not work on x86 anymore, as well. So, wouldn't it be smarter, to
>> > > figure
>> > > out why it stopped working on sparc? I mean, -z ignore ain't such an
>> > > esotheric
>> > > switch and has been put in place for good reasons, hasn't it?
>> > >
>> > > cheers
>> > > rafi
>> > >
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20131104/72d3c29d/attachment-0001.html>