Goodbye, Sourceforge!

[Ben Walton]

I'm also on with keeping svn as the VCS of record to make the transition
easier. As much as is prefer git,I don't have the energy to drive that
conversion.

A different official source for the repo is all that's needed, IMO.

Thanks
-Ben

On Sun, May 31, 2015, 6:45 PM Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Am 31.05.2015 um 19:38 schrieb Peter FELECAN:
> > Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> writes:
> >> http://helb.github.io/goodbye-sourceforge/
> >>
> >> Shall we move our code?
> >
> > If what's written in the referenced information, why not.
> > However, it's not such an easy transition mgar and scm wise.
> > Have we the resources to make such a transition?
>
> Well, the initial reason for using SourceForge as SVN repo was from the
> experience with
> Blastwave taking down the repo. I don't think it is reasonable to believe
> this is a
> problem any more. Hosting an SVN repo is not that hard and it would be
> good to integrate
> that into our existing Trac. As we have raw access to the repo the
> transition for
> users should be as easy as an "svn switch". Additionally, I don't think we
> are in any
> hurry, we could also discuss moving to another hoster. Switching the VC
> (e.g. to Git) is
> a completely different issue I would like to keep out of the discussion
> for now.
>
>
> Best regards
>
>   -- Dago
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20150531/2f601338/attachment.html>