OpenSSL 1.0.2 transition

[Dagobert Michelsen]

Hi Riccardo,

Am 11.05.2017 um 00:17 schrieb Riccardo Mottola <rmottola at opencsw.org>:
> Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
>> Sure, if in doubt just ask:-)
>> 
> I can package on 9x, 10s, 10x.
> However on 9s, I get these:
> 
> 
> CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWlibssl1-0-0 += binary-architecture-does-not-match-placement|file=opt/csw/lib/libcrypto.so.1.0.0|arch_id=18|arch_name=sparcv8+
> CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWlibssl1-0-0 += binary-architecture-does-not-match-placement|file=opt/csw/lib/libssl.so.1.0.0|arch_id=18|arch_name=sparcv8+
> CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWlibssl1-0-0 += binary-architecture-does-not-match-placement|file=opt/csw/lib/openssl-1.0.0/engines/libaep.so|arch_id=18|arch_name=sparcv8+
> CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWlibssl1-0-0 += binary-architecture-does-not-match-placement|file=opt/csw/lib/openssl-1.0.0/engines/libchil.so|arch_id=18|arch_name=sparcv8+
> CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWlibssl1-0-0 += binary-architecture-does-not-match-placement|file=opt/csw/lib/openssl-1.0.0/engines/libsureware.so|arch_id=18|arch_name=sparcv8+
> CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWlibssl1-0-0 += binary-architecture-does-not-match-placement|file=opt/csw/lib/openssl-1.0.0/engines/libpadlock.so|arch_id=18|arch_name=sparcv8+
> CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWlibssl1-0-0 += binary-architecture-does-not-match-placement|file=opt/csw/lib/openssl-1.0.0/engines/libnuron.so|arch_id=18|arch_name=sparcv8+
> CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWlibssl1-0-0 += binary-architecture-does-not-match-placement|file=opt/csw/lib/openssl-1.0.0/engines/libatalla.so|arch_id=18|arch_name=sparcv8+
> CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWlibssl1-0-0 += binary-architecture-does-not-match-placement|file=opt/csw/lib/openssl-1.0.0/engines/libubsec.so|arch_id=18|arch_name=sparcv8+
> CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWlibssl1-0-0 += binary-architecture-does-not-match-placement|file=opt/csw/lib/openssl-1.0.0/engines/libgmp.so|arch_id=18|arch_name=sparcv8+
> CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWlibssl1-0-0 += binary-architecture-does-not-match-placement|file=opt/csw/lib/openssl-1.0.0/engines/lib4758cca.so|arch_id=18|arch_name=sparcv8+
> CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWlibssl1-0-0 += binary-architecture-does-not-match-placement|file=opt/csw/lib/openssl-1.0.0/engines/libcapi.so|arch_id=18|arch_name=sparcv8+
> CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWlibssl1-0-0 += binary-architecture-does-not-match-placement|file=opt/csw/lib/openssl-1.0.0/engines/libgost.so|arch_id=18|arch_name=sparcv8+
> CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWlibssl1-0-0 += binary-architecture-does-not-match-placement|file=opt/csw/lib/openssl-1.0.0/engines/libcswift.so|arch_id=18|arch_name=sparcv8+
> 
> since I do not see overrides for others.
> 
> Might it have do with ISA_DEFAULT = sparcv8plus ?

Yes.

> If the overrides are legit, is there a better solution to have them go away than overriding?

In this case I would just override with a comment explaining why
the ISA was raised.


Best regards

  — Dago

--
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20170511/18bc0dc0/attachment.asc>