[openssl-announce] OpenSSL version 1.0.2l published

Dagobert Michelsen dam at opencsw.org
Wed May 31 16:43:23 CEST 2017


Hi Riccardo,

> Am 30.05.2017 um 15:22 schrieb Riccardo Mottola <rmottola at opencsw.org>:
> 
> Hi guys,

The Solaris 11 version is lacking the 64 bit libssl.so.1.0.0 library!

These lines were missing:

dam at unstable11s [unstable11s]:/home/dam/mgar/pkg/openssl1/branches/lts102 > /opt/csw/bin/svn diff
Index: Makefile
===================================================================
--- Makefile    (Revision 26218)
+++ Makefile    (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -184,6 +184,8 @@
 BUILD64-sparc-5.9 = 1
 BUILD64-sparc-5.10 = 1
 BUILD64-i386-5.10 = 1
+BUILD64-sparc-5.11 = 1
+BUILD64-i386-5.11 = 1
 BUILD64 = $(BUILD64-$(GARCH)-$(GAROSREL))

 ISA_DEFAULT_i386-5.9 = pentium_pro


I committed, so you can just „svn up“ and „mgar remerge && mgar repackage“.


Best regards

  — Dago

> 
> 
> Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
>> We can continue testing with what we have and build the new ones in parallel.
> 
> just finished updating.. everything still builds and tests continue to pass!
> 
> I commited and moved all the packages to /home/experimental/openssl like last time
> Let me know!
> 
> Do you confirm that the suggested compilers I am using are the best option for each OS?
> 
> # This recipe can be used to compile openssl with Sun Studio or GCC
> # Just define the GARCOMPILER to the GNU or SUN
> GARCOMPILER_5.9 = SOS12
> GARCOMPILER_5.10 = SOS12U4
> GARCOMPILER_5.11 = SOS12U4
> GARCOMPILER = $(GARCOMPILER_$(GAROSREL))
> GARCOMPILER_TYPE = $(if $(findstring GCC,$(GARCOMPILER)),GNU,SUN)
> 
> 
> Right now everything works because I disabled most "extra" optimizations supplied with the patch:
> PATCHFILES += optimized_configure_targets.patch
> 
> Because this caused build failures, link failures on most platforms and did not even work at all on 9.
> 
> In case, we probably need to tweak this matrix:
> # The corresponding os/compiler to pass to the
> # openssl Configure script
> i386_SUN_CONFIGURE_TARGET               = no-sse2 solaris-x86-cc-sunw
> pentium_pro_SUN_CONFIGURE_TARGET        = solaris-x86-cc-sunw
> amd64_SUN_CONFIGURE_TARGET              = solaris64-x86_64-cc-sunw
> 
> i386_GNU_CONFIGURE_TARGET               = no-sse2 solaris-x86-gcc
> pentium_pro_GNU_CONFIGURE_TARGET        = solaris-x86-gcc
> amd64_GNU_CONFIGURE_TARGET              = solaris64-x86_64-gcc
> 
> sparcv8_SUN_CONFIGURE_TARGET            = solaris-sparcv8-cc-sunw
> sparcv8plus_SUN_CONFIGURE_TARGET        = solaris-sparcv9-cc-sunw
> sparcv8plus+vis_SUN_CONFIGURE_TARGET    = solaris-sparcv9+vis-cc-sunw
> sparcv9_SUN_CONFIGURE_TARGET_5.11               = solaris64-sparcv9-cc-sunw
> sparcv9_SUN_CONFIGURE_TARGET_5.10               = solaris64-sparcv9-cc-sunw10
> sparcv9_SUN_CONFIGURE_TARGET            = $(sparcv9_SUN_CONFIGURE_TARGET_$(GAROSREL))
> 
> depending on OS and Compiler (if that makes sense... I think that OS should use the corresponding compiler, am I right?)
> 
> But maybe this makes sense only if Jan discovers a bad performance drop.
> 
> Riccardo

--
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20170531/a96dbc7c/attachment.asc>


More information about the maintainers mailing list