rebuild a package - same version number,
dam at opencsw.org
Sun Apr 29 21:15:36 CEST 2018
Am 29.04.2018 um 13:24 schrieb Riccardo Mottola <rmottola at opencsw.org>:
> Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
>> The package name is broken, there must not be an uppercase character after CSW.
>> In this case there is already a correctly named package CSWperformance.
>> Just change the name back as it was before (CSWperformance is fine) and
>> it should work.
> the original package however has an uppercase P, thus the distfile and the source have it.
> If I name the package performance, then I need to tweak other things somehow.
> I can workaround the distfile by doing:
> DISTFILES = Performance-$(VERSION).tar.gz
> but how can I tweak the source best?
> I suppose it is better not to tamper with WORKSRC directly, right?
> gmake: Entering directory '/home/rmottola/opencsw/gs_performance/trunk/work/solaris10-sparc/build-isa-sparcv8plus/performance-0.5.0'
> gmake: *** No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop.
> gmake: Leaving directory '/home/rmottola/opencsw/gs_performance/trunk/work/solaris10-sparc/build-isa-sparcv8plus/performance-0.5.0'
Something nasty happened - there were some instances of CSWPerformance in the package database
although I could not reproduce the issue as the release package has the correct name CSWperformance.
I reformatted the Makefile a bit, so please „svn up“ but the main task was getting the old stuff removed
from the package database manually by editing the tables. I guess this was an old isse we had a long
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the maintainers