[csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_pdfapi2

[Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski]

No dia 9 de Janeiro de 2011 15:10, Peter FELECAN
<pfelecan at opencsw.org> escreveu:
> If you do that, please make the test a lot more discriminating as it is
> today: a lot of false positives in documentation files (not man
> pages). Giving the file where the check failed is a must. Also, you need
> to implement an overriding system usable from outside gar and on non
> build farm systems.

Roger that.  At the end of the run, all offending paths are printed out.

Overrides are available for non-gar packages as well, they have to be.
 Checkpkg only examines contents of packages, and there's a defined
API to provide overrides.  You basically need to provide an "i" entry
in the pkgmap, pointing to a text file with your overrides.  Details
are on the wiki[1].

Dealing with false positives is an interesting issue.  Currently,
there is no path filtering, which means that any file containing the
offending string will throw an error.  The simplest solution to deal
with documentation would be to exclude all the /opt/csw/share/doc
paths.  Does it sound good?  Any other ideas?

[1] http://wiki.opencsw.org/checkpkg#toc8