[csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_pdfapi2
Peter FELECAN
pfelecan at opencsw.org
Sun Jan 9 19:47:52 CET 2011
Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> writes:
> On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Peter FELECAN <pfelecan at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> Philip Brown <phil at opencsw.org> writes:
>>
>>> The trouble with that (and /opt/csw/share/man), is that sometimes,
>>> there are things in there that really SHOULD be updated.
>>>
>>> I wont be filtering it out.
>>> So, if you're going to be okay with "these things are supposed to be
>>> caught by the release manager " (and you DOCUMENT IT loudly
>>> somewhere), maybe that's okay. But i'd personaly prefer that the
>>> maintainer actually look at them first, to potentially save me having
>>> to look at them.
>>
>> If the maintainer overrides it it means that's alright. Isn't it? Trust
>> the maintainer...
>
>
> If it is known that the maintainer has actually looked at it, rather
> than it being blindly ignored, then yes that would be much better.
For my part I always run checkpkg after building a package. It's part
of my packaging process. Same on Debian or RedHat.
--
Peter
More information about the pkgsubmissions
mailing list