[csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs py_webpy

[Philip Brown]

On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Thu Jan 20 12:20:15 -0500 2011:
>
> Hi Phil,
>
>> seems like it should either be "py_web" or just "webpy".
>
> It's not a nice name (aethetically), but it does conform to the
> standard.  The framework is web.py, it's referenced as /webpy/ in the
> documentation on the homepage and py_ is our preferred prefix for
> python modules.
>

our standard also says (going from memory, since you didnt give
explicit url), that while of course, py_xxx is preferred, some things
that are well known as something else, are best named as that thing,
rather than py_thatthing.

So here I'm asking the maintainer (or more regular users of this
framework, if the maintainer isnt a regular user of it) if that naming
makes more sense. Is it reasonable that some random outside user of
the framework, new to csw, is going to expect

[install] webpy

to work?

Given that the thing is homed at "webpy.org", it seems like the answer
would be "yes".