[csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs py_webpy

[Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski]

No dia 20 de Janeiro de 2011 17:36, Philip Brown <phil at opencsw.org> escreveu:
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Thu Jan 20 12:20:15 -0500 2011:
>>
>> Hi Phil,
>>
>>> seems like it should either be "py_web" or just "webpy".
>>
>> It's not a nice name (aethetically), but it does conform to the
>> standard.  The framework is web.py, it's referenced as /webpy/ in the
>> documentation on the homepage and py_ is our preferred prefix for
>> python modules.
>>
>
> our standard also says (going from memory, since you didnt give
> explicit url), that while of course, py_xxx is preferred, some things
> that are well known as something else, are best named as that thing,
> rather than py_thatthing.
>
> So here I'm asking the maintainer (or more regular users of this
> framework, if the maintainer isnt a regular user of it) if that naming
> makes more sense. Is it reasonable that some random outside user of
> the framework, new to csw, is going to expect
>
> [install] webpy
>
> to work?
>
> Given that the thing is homed at "webpy.org", it seems like the answer
> would be "yes".

According to what we agreed on, the presence of py_ prefix depends on
whether it's a library or a standalone program.

http://wiki.opencsw.org/python-packages-naming

webpy is a library, not a standalone program, so unless we change the
policy, the catalogname is py_webpy.