[csw-users] n00bness kicking in

[Tim Smith]

Solaris 10/sparc, not really a full install.

bash-3.00$ ./firefox
ld.so.1: firefox-bin: fatal: libgconf-2.so.4: open failed: No such file 
or directory
ld.so.1: firefox-bin: fatal: libORBit-2.so.0: open failed: No such file 
or directory
ld.so.1: firefox-bin: fatal: libgconf-2.so.4: open failed: No such file 
or directory
ld.so.1: firefox-bin: fatal: libgnomevfs-2.so.0: open failed: No such 
file or directory
ld.so.1: firefox-bin: fatal: libbonobo-activation.so.4: open failed: No 
such file or directory
ld.so.1: firefox-bin: fatal: libgnome-2.so.0: open failed: No such file 
or directory
ld.so.1: firefox-bin: fatal: libgconf-2.so.4: open failed: No such file 
or directory
ld.so.1: firefox-bin: fatal: libbonobo-2.so.0: open failed: No such file 
or directory
ld.so.1: firefox-bin: fatal: relocation error: file 
/export/firefox/firefox/components/libmozgnome.so: symbol 
gconf_client_get_default: referenced symbol not found
Killed


Missing a bunch of gnome crap that I'd rather not have 2 installed 
copies of (sunw and csw) :-/





Darin Perusich wrote:

>no worries, we don't use $LD_LIBRARY_PATH here at blastwave.
>
>i use both firefox and thunderbird from the mozilla contribs without
>setting $LD_LIBRARY_PATH or changing the crle(1) and they both work
>fine. what version of solaris and is it a full install?
>
>Tim Smith wrote:
>  
>
>>bash-3.00$ echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH
>>
>>bash-3.00$
>>
>>
>>should I worry?
>>
>>
>>Mats Larsson wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>On 2006-09-12 16:56, EBradley at williams-int.com wrote:
>>> 
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>Really?  Hmm...I've used the firefox from that site since 1.0 on both
>>>>Sol 9 and 10 on several types of Sun hardware without incident.
>>>>   
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>Same here. Always work as expected. Sure you haven't messed up your 
>>>LD_LIBRARY_PATH?
>>>
>>>/MOL
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: users-bounces+ebradley=williams-int.com at lists.blastwave.org
>>>>[mailto:users-bounces+ebradley=williams-int.com at lists.blastwave.org] On
>>>>Behalf Of Tim Smith
>>>>Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2006 10:48 AM
>>>>To: questions and discussions
>>>>Subject: Re: [csw-users] n00bness kicking in
>>>>
>>>>Tried that version and it didnt work :-(
>>>>
>>>>Segfaults for me every time (tbird too).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>EBradley at williams-int.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>   
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>>>Not to discourage someone using pkg-get, but firefox is available via 
>>>>>the web for the Solaris platform.
>>>>>
>>>>>http://www.mozilla.com/firefox/releases/1.5.0.6.html#othersystems
>>>>>
>>>>>And then it's aaallllll the way down at the bottom of the page in 
>>>>>either a tarball or pkgadd format.  The tarball is what I've always
>>>>>     
>>>>>
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>>>>done.
>>>>   
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>>>Untar it, cd into the directory, and your binary is right there.
>>>>>
>>>>>:)
>>>>>
>>>>>Evan D. Bradley
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>>From: users-bounces+ebradley=williams-int.com at lists.blastwave.org
>>>>>[mailto:users-bounces+ebradley=williams-int.com at lists.blastwave.org] On
>>>>>     
>>>>>
>>>>>Behalf Of Tim Smith
>>>>>Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2006 10:32 AM
>>>>>To: questions and discussions
>>>>>Subject: [csw-users] n00bness kicking in
>>>>>
>>>>>Ok, I'm trying to upgrade firefox from the ancient 1.0.6 ive been stuck
>>>>>     
>>>>>
>>>>>with to the new shiny 1.5.whatever that I just noticed is availible.
>>>>>
>>>>>The problem is, it has a lot of deps that need updating.
>>>>>
>>>>>Right now, I'm manually re-running pkg-get -i firefox, waiting for it 
>>>>>to DL 20 megs, then waiting to see which package dep needs updating, 
>>>>>then repeating the process down the chain for each package ....
>>>>>
>>>>>running pkg-get -h doesnt seem to provide a better way.
>>>>>
>>>>>Is there a quicker way I can give pkg-get an argument to "update 
>>>>>dependancies as needed but dont update everything on my system", as I 
>>>>>do
>>>>>-NOT- want to invoke a qt/kde update by accident...
>>>>>
>>>>>does that question make sense?
>>>>>
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>
>
>  
>

-- 
Timothy Smith
IT Administrator
Degree Controls, INC

Please do not email me microsoft word documents, read here to learn why:
http://www.nothingisreal.com/dfki/no-word