[csw-users] n00bness kicking in

[Alekz]

You can do something like that:

# more /opt/sfw/bin/firefox
. . .
##
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/lib:/usr/lib:/usr/openwin/lib:/usr/dt/lib:/opt/sfw/lib:/opt/csw/lib
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH
. . .

-Alexey


On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Tim Smith wrote:

>Solaris 10/sparc, not really a full install.
>
>bash-3.00$ ./firefox
>ld.so.1: firefox-bin: fatal: libgconf-2.so.4: open failed: No such file
>or directory
>ld.so.1: firefox-bin: fatal: libORBit-2.so.0: open failed: No such file
>or directory
>ld.so.1: firefox-bin: fatal: libgconf-2.so.4: open failed: No such file
>or directory
>ld.so.1: firefox-bin: fatal: libgnomevfs-2.so.0: open failed: No such
>file or directory
>ld.so.1: firefox-bin: fatal: libbonobo-activation.so.4: open failed: No
>such file or directory
>ld.so.1: firefox-bin: fatal: libgnome-2.so.0: open failed: No such file
>or directory
>ld.so.1: firefox-bin: fatal: libgconf-2.so.4: open failed: No such file
>or directory
>ld.so.1: firefox-bin: fatal: libbonobo-2.so.0: open failed: No such file
>or directory
>ld.so.1: firefox-bin: fatal: relocation error: file
>/export/firefox/firefox/components/libmozgnome.so: symbol
>gconf_client_get_default: referenced symbol not found
>Killed
>
>
>Missing a bunch of gnome crap that I'd rather not have 2 installed
>copies of (sunw and csw) :-/
>
>
>
>
>
>Darin Perusich wrote:
>
>>no worries, we don't use $LD_LIBRARY_PATH here at blastwave.
>>
>>i use both firefox and thunderbird from the mozilla contribs without
>>setting $LD_LIBRARY_PATH or changing the crle(1) and they both work
>>fine. what version of solaris and is it a full install?
>>
>>Tim Smith wrote:
>>
>>
>>>bash-3.00$ echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH
>>>
>>>bash-3.00$
>>>
>>>
>>>should I worry?
>>>
>>>
>>>Mats Larsson wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>On 2006-09-12 16:56, EBradley at williams-int.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Really?  Hmm...I've used the firefox from that site since 1.0 on both
>>>>>Sol 9 and 10 on several types of Sun hardware without incident.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>Same here. Always work as expected. Sure you haven't messed up your
>>>>LD_LIBRARY_PATH?
>>>>
>>>>/MOL
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>>From: users-bounces+ebradley=williams-int.com at lists.blastwave.org
>>>>>[mailto:users-bounces+ebradley=williams-int.com at lists.blastwave.org] On
>>>>>Behalf Of Tim Smith
>>>>>Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2006 10:48 AM
>>>>>To: questions and discussions
>>>>>Subject: Re: [csw-users] n00bness kicking in
>>>>>
>>>>>Tried that version and it didnt work :-(
>>>>>
>>>>>Segfaults for me every time (tbird too).
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>EBradley at williams-int.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Not to discourage someone using pkg-get, but firefox is available via
>>>>>>the web for the Solaris platform.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>http://www.mozilla.com/firefox/releases/1.5.0.6.html#othersystems
>>>>>>
>>>>>>And then it's aaallllll the way down at the bottom of the page in
>>>>>>either a tarball or pkgadd format.  The tarball is what I've always
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>done.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Untar it, cd into the directory, and your binary is right there.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>:)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Evan D. Bradley
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>>>From: users-bounces+ebradley=williams-int.com at lists.blastwave.org
>>>>>>[mailto:users-bounces+ebradley=williams-int.com at lists.blastwave.org] On
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Behalf Of Tim Smith
>>>>>>Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2006 10:32 AM
>>>>>>To: questions and discussions
>>>>>>Subject: [csw-users] n00bness kicking in
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Ok, I'm trying to upgrade firefox from the ancient 1.0.6 ive been stuck
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>with to the new shiny 1.5.whatever that I just noticed is availible.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>The problem is, it has a lot of deps that need updating.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Right now, I'm manually re-running pkg-get -i firefox, waiting for it
>>>>>>to DL 20 megs, then waiting to see which package dep needs updating,
>>>>>>then repeating the process down the chain for each package ....
>>>>>>
>>>>>>running pkg-get -h doesnt seem to provide a better way.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Is there a quicker way I can give pkg-get an argument to "update
>>>>>>dependancies as needed but dont update everything on my system", as I
>>>>>>do
>>>>>>-NOT- want to invoke a qt/kde update by accident...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>does that question make sense?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>