[csw-users] users Digest, Vol 75, Issue 1
Wim Van Dijck
wim.vandijck at sun.com
Wed May 12 14:35:17 CEST 2010
Hi Dago,
the Nagios issue is not a concern anymore, as be backed down to perl 5.8. We'll re-upgrade later when the package is in the current branch.
However, we still need the gd modules working now :-)
Any reason why I still get this error?
Could it be that there's another perl module that is causing this? (some dependence issue?)
Kindest regards,
Wim
Hi Wim,
Am 12.05.2010 um 12:47 schrieb Wim Van Dijck:
>/ We recently noticed that after an update of our CSW packages,
/>/ there's a bug that prevents Nagios from working with the perl 5.10
/>/ package.
/
Jürgen has already rebuilt Nagios, but not released yet due to some
more testing
needed:
<http://mirror.opencsw.org/experimental.html#ja>
Please verify and I think Jürgen will it soon.
Best regards
-- Dago
--
Wim Van Dijck
FODFin IAM support
Sun Microsystems
On 12/05/10 13:31, users-request at lists.opencsw.org wrote:
> Send users mailing list submissions to
> users at lists.opencsw.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> users-request at lists.opencsw.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> users-owner at lists.opencsw.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of users digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Problems with python hashlib (Jos? Plana)
> 2. mesalibs mglu versus glu (Wyche, George PW)
> 3. Re: mesalibs mglu versus glu (Wyche, George PW)
> 4. Re: mesalibs mglu versus glu (Dagobert Michelsen)
> 5. Re: mesalibs mglu versus glu (Dagobert Michelsen)
> 6. Re: does wireshark need canberra? (Nicolai Schwindt)
> 7. symbol Perl_Gthr_key_ptr: referenced symbol not found after
> forced Perl downgrade (Wim Van Dijck)
> 8. Re: symbol Perl_Gthr_key_ptr: referenced symbol not found
> after forced Perl downgrade (Peter Bonivart)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 16:27:01 +0200
> From: Jos? Plana<jplana at gmail.com>
> To: users at lists.opencsw.org
> Subject: Re: [csw-users] Problems with python hashlib
> Message-ID:<op.vba83bkkd8dor0 at thinp.local>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed;
> delsp=yes
>
> En Sat, 17 Apr 2010 15:29:29 +0200, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski
> <maciej at opencsw.org> escribi?:
>
>
> Hi
>
>> No dia 17 de Abril de 2010 14:23, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski
>> <maciej at opencsw.org> escreveu:
>>
>>> Looking at http://www.opencsw.org/search/openssl_rt it seems like the
>>> files are indeed missing from the package.
>>>
>> No, I'm blind. The package is OK. I was looking for
>> /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8, I don't know why. The
>> /opt/csw/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8 file is in the package, and the others
>> are too. This would point to a problem with your installation.
>> Perhaps the files were accidentally removed?
>>
>>
> The files are present, in /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus+vis/, however my
> installation procedure was non standard, as I upgraded from blastwave to
> opencsw packages.
>
>
>> The removal could happen during an upgrade, for example when you use
>> pkg-get and files are moved from one package to another. Here's a
>> case that might be similar to yours:
>> http://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=4004
>>
>>
> The curious thing is that I removed openssl with pkgrm and then tried to
> install again with pkg-get. If there's nobody else reporting the same
> problem then it's probably just my installation. Thanks for your help!
>
>
>> Maciej
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 15:31:05 -0400
> From: "Wyche, George PW"<George.Wyche at pw.utc.com>
> To: "Questions and discussions"<users at lists.opencsw.org>
> Subject: [csw-users] mesalibs mglu versus glu
> Message-ID:
> <239E996F5C620A4E8A369B7D818326B20117BF91 at PUSMNEI1.pwemail.us>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> As a sparc Solaris8 user today I did "pkg-get -I mesalibs glut"
>
> I compiled a c program against (sparc) /opt/csw/lib/libGLU.so which left
> numerous, suspicious undefined symbols all starting with mglu. I spent
> some time looking around the internet and this is not an uncommon
> problem, but I do not understand how I can solve it.
>
> None of the messages went into detail about the nature of the problem,
> but nearly all solutions had to do with modifying the ***library***
> makefile, taking that solution out of my ballpark. Things like
> glu.exports glu.exports.in mangle.h were mentioned. There were mumbles
> that the mglu... were meant to be internal library references, but
> somehow our Solar loader (and other unix loaders) sees them as
> unsatisfied externals and won't make my executable.
>
> To whom might I address this issue further?
>
> George Wyche
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 11:33:33 -0400
> From: "Wyche, George PW"<George.Wyche at pw.utc.com>
> To: "Questions and discussions"<users at lists.opencsw.org>
> Subject: Re: [csw-users] mesalibs mglu versus glu
> Message-ID:
> <239E996F5C620A4E8A369B7D818326B2011A43E9 at PUSMNEI1.pwemail.us>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Paul Lanken suggests checking out BlastWave which, presciently it would
> seem, now uses Solaris10 as its base level, instead of pursuing my
> wonderment here at opencsw which very recently abandoned Solaris8 as its
> base level.
>
> I don't like mixing and matching. I get into trouble (faster) when I do
> that. But following Mr. Lanken's lead I suppose I should investigate Mr.
> Christensen's sunfreeware, too. I started with them lo' these many years
> ago.
>
> Bigger picture efforts would be to fight (much) harder to get all these
> Sun workstations redone with Solaris10 to try and stay (not ahead) up
> with the game. However, management, rightly so, is not interested in
> such activity unless it translates rather directly into "positive" cash
> flow. As a programmer I am not highly motivated to put together a
> "business plan" whose myopic goal is attempting to link a rather simple
> glut program.
>
> ggw
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 17:43:24 +0200
> From: Dagobert Michelsen<dam at opencsw.org>
> To: Questions and discussions<users at lists.opencsw.org>
> Subject: Re: [csw-users] mesalibs mglu versus glu
> Message-ID:<53A0C43D-4693-4072-AEA7-4DCCC6F5C70F at opencsw.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
>
> Hi George,
>
> Am 27.04.2010 um 17:33 schrieb Wyche, George PW:
>
>> Paul Lanken suggests checking out BlastWave
>>
> Please notice that Paul Lanken is heavily biased towards Blastwave
> and IMHO uses unacceltable wording. Please take a look at his
> last postings at
> <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/2008-December/007827.html>
> <http://www.h-online.com/open/news/forum/S-Re-The-facts-of-the-matter-are-somewhat-different/forum-110420/msg-14369987/read/
> >
>
>
>> I don't like mixing and matching. I get into trouble (faster) when I
>> do
>> that. But following Mr. Lanken's lead I suppose I should investigate
>> Mr.
>> Christensen's sunfreeware, too. I started with them lo' these many
>> years
>> ago.
>>
> I started writing a comparison of Solaris packages distributions at
> <http://wiki.opencsw.org/solarisdistributions>
> It is currently at draft level, but feel free to take a look and
> comment. In fact, SFW is very much different from OpenCSW as outlined
> there.
>
>
> Best regards
>
> -- Dago
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 17:45:00 +0200
> From: Dagobert Michelsen<dam at opencsw.org>
> To: Questions and discussions<users at lists.opencsw.org>
> Subject: Re: [csw-users] mesalibs mglu versus glu
> Message-ID:<04D28497-1007-4B58-98D7-B5F6AE14F265 at opencsw.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
>
> Hi George,
>
> Am 22.04.2010 um 21:31 schrieb Wyche, George PW:
>
>> As a sparc Solaris8 user today I did "pkg-get -I mesalibs glut"
>>
>> I compiled a c program against (sparc) /opt/csw/lib/libGLU.so which
>> left
>> numerous, suspicious undefined symbols all starting with mglu. I spent
>> some time looking around the internet and this is not an uncommon
>> problem, but I do not understand how I can solve it.
>>
>> None of the messages went into detail about the nature of the problem,
>> but nearly all solutions had to do with modifying the ***library***
>> makefile, taking that solution out of my ballpark. Things like
>> glu.exports glu.exports.in mangle.h were mentioned. There were mumbles
>> that the mglu... were meant to be internal library references, but
>> somehow our Solar loader (and other unix loaders) sees them as
>> unsatisfied externals and won't make my executable.
>>
>> To whom might I address this issue further?
>>
> James is maintaining mesa and he may suggest something. I have
> put him on cc'.
>
>
> Best regards
>
> -- Dago
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 14:37:53 +0200
> From: Nicolai Schwindt<schwindt at dfki.uni-kl.de>
> To: Questions and discussions<users at lists.opencsw.org>
> Subject: Re: [csw-users] does wireshark need canberra?
> Message-ID:<201005041237.o44CbrX4017811 at dfki.uni-kl.de>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>
>
>> 2010/3/24 gerard<ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr>:
>>
>>> yes, and if i compare with SUNWwireshark in opensolaris:
>>> $ /usr/ccs/bin/dump -Lv /usr/sbin/wireshark
>>> doesn't show libcanberra, but a pldd on the process shows it:
>>> ?? henry ??1148 ??1045 ?? 1 16:23:43 pts/6 ?? ?? ?? 0:00 wireshark
>>> $ pldd 1148|grep canb
>>> /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libcanberra-gtk-module.so
>>>
>>> i guess this is something related to gnome?
>>>
>> I've verified that no OpenCSW binary has cranberra in NEEDED. It's
>> probably something specific to your system. Try ransacking your
>> library directories for a library that pulls cranberra in. Look at
>> /usr/local/lib.
>>
> or crle
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 12:47:26 +0200
> From: Wim Van Dijck<wim.vandijck at sun.com>
> To: users at lists.opencsw.org
> Subject: [csw-users] symbol Perl_Gthr_key_ptr: referenced symbol not
> found after forced Perl downgrade
> Message-ID:<4BEA873E.6080501 at sun.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Hi all,
>
> We recently noticed that after an update of our CSW packages, there's a
> bug that prevents Nagios from working with the perl 5.10 package.
> So I changed the repositary from current to stable, and downgraded perl
> to 5.8
>
> Nagios is working again, but now I'm having problems with perl modules.
> I understand that the modules obviously must be the same version as the
> perl package, so I removed them and reinstalled them.
> But I keep seeing this error in apache:
> ld.so.1: perl: fatal: relocation error: file
> /opt/csw/lib/perl/csw/auto/GD/GD.so: symbol Perl_Gthr_key_ptr:
> referenced symbol not found
> GD.so is part of the CSWpmgd package. I've reinstalled it already (as
> well as CSWgd and CSWpmgdgraph), and am not sure which way to go now...
>
> Any hints?
> Many thanks,
> Kind regards,
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20100512/db45a02b/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the users
mailing list