[csw-maintainers] [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs cups
Philip Brown
phil at bolthole.com
Tue Nov 16 00:35:28 CET 2010
On 11/11/10, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski <maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
>
>> if people are going to be able to follow either a proposal or policy,
>> it needs to be written up as an explicit document unto itself.
>
> Fair enough. I wrote it up, here's the link:
>
> http://wiki.opencsw.org/packaging-shared-libraries
>
Thank you for doing so. I now finally have the time to properly
review, and write up a reply.
I'll make a comment here, so that it doesnt gum up the other thread:
I think your italicized pre-amble was .. well, i was going to call it
something else, but I'll instead call it "counter-productive".
If you were saying "Please dont pick needlessly at grammar", that's sensible.
But it seems like you are almost saying "dont point out any flaws in
the proposal at all".
More information about the maintainers
mailing list