[csw-maintainers] Call for vote: -dev vs. -devel

[Peter FELECAN]

Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> writes:

> On 2/24/11, Maciej Bliziński <maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
>>  I'm inclined to do no writeup whatsoever, and only
>> include a link to this thread:
>>
>> http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/2011-February/014148.html
>>
>
> which will ensure that some people will not read it.

Why do you think so? It's a URI accessible for everybody, isn't it?

> There is a solution to this; I already proposed it in a thread a while
> back, but I'll repeat it.
> have one person from "each side", do a part of the writeup.
> This is a standard real-world methodology for ballots in some places.
>
> Each "side" gets complete control over their part of the writeup.
> There should only be editorial fiddling, if either one side gives
> *factually incorrect* statements, or it is just ludicrously long. (3x
> the length of the other side, or something)

The message at the head of this thread cites a honest summary that
Dagobert has done. There is nothing wrong with that. Or is it?
-- 
Peter