[csw-maintainers] [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs puppet, puppetmaster

[Dagobert Michelsen]

Hi Phil,

Am 17.05.2011 um 20:13 schrieb Philip Brown:
> On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> Am 17.05.2011 um 18:47 schrieb Ben Walton:
>>> Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Tue May 17 12:40:46 -0400 2011:
>>> 
>>>> Reguardless of what triggered it, I think that the mgar [re]package
>>>> code, should refuse to continue if it attempts to package something
>>>> with OPENCSW_REPOSITORY=.*UNCOMMITTED
>>> 
>>> Actually, this should be a check added to checkpkg.  The [re]package
>>> target in mgar shouldn't care about this.
>> 
>> I thought submitpkg already had a trigger in it refusing to submit
>> uncommitted packages?
> 
> It has yet to be proven or disproven whether or not the involved files
> are committed, or uncommitted.
> They may well be committed.
> All we know for sure(until the original maintainer pipes up) at this
> point, is that the pkginfo is not what is desired.

*If* pkginfo and/or the package name has "uncommitted" in the name the
packaging directory in GAR has not been completely committed which
is not good. A package resulting from such a build should not be
released.


Best regards

  -- Dago