[csw-maintainers] [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs puppet, puppetmaster

[Philip Brown]

On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> (moving to maintainers@)
>
> Am 17.05.2011 um 18:47 schrieb Ben Walton:
>> Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Tue May 17 12:40:46 -0400 2011:
>>
>>> Reguardless of what triggered it, I think that the mgar [re]package
>>> code, should refuse to continue if it attempts to package something
>>> with OPENCSW_REPOSITORY=.*UNCOMMITTED
>>
>> Actually, this should be a check added to checkpkg.  The [re]package
>> target in mgar shouldn't care about this.
>
> I thought submitpkg already had a trigger in it refusing to submit
> uncommitted packages?
>


It has yet to be proven or disproven whether or not the involved files
are committed, or uncommitted.
They may well be committed.
All we know for sure(until the original maintainer pipes up) at this
point, is that the pkginfo is not what is desired.