[csw-maintainers] libserf, checkpkg errors, e.g. use ssl-0.9.8 instead of ssl-1.0.0

[rupert THURNER]

you are right. subverison is only for solaris 10, and its fine for
serf as well. on unstable10s it gives:

# Checkpkg suggests adding the following lines to the GAR recipe:
# This is a summary; see above for details.
# The following lines define a new package: CSWlibserf1-0
PACKAGES += CSWlibserf1-0
CATALOGNAME_CSWlibserf1-0 = libserf1_0
PKGFILES_CSWlibserf1-0 += $(call baseisadirs,$(libdir),libserf-1\.so\.0\.0\.0)
PKGFILES_CSWlibserf1-0 += $(call baseisadirs,$(libdir),libserf-1\.so\.0(\.\d+)*)
SPKG_DESC_CSWlibserf1-0 += $(DESCRIPTION), libserf-1.so.0
RUNTIME_DEP_PKGS_CSWlibserf1-1 += CSWlibserf1-0
# The end of CSWlibserf1-0 definition

why checkpkg thinks there should be a reference from 1.1 to 1.0?



On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Excerpts from rupert THURNER's message of Thu Aug 16 15:18:56 -0400 2012:
>
>> oh .. it got cut off. unstable9s, unstable9x.
>
> The ssl 1.0 update was only for solaris 10.  I'd suggest abandoning
> solaris 9 for this library unless you want to add the dependency based
> on a variable and build for both platforms separately.
>
> That would look something like:
>
> PACKAGING_PLATFORMS =  solaris9-i386 solaris9-sparc solaris10-i386 solaris10-sparc
>
> RUNTIME_DEP_PKGS_SunOS5.9 = CSWlibssl0-9-8
> RUNTIME_DEP_PKGS_SunOS5.10 = CSWlibssl1-0-0
>
> RUNTIME_DEP_PKGS += RUNTIME_DEP_PKGS_$(GAROSREL)
>
> (Not checked, it might need a small tweak.)
>
> It's up to you whether you go this route or not though.
>
> Thanks
> -Ben
> --
> Ben Walton
> Systems Programmer - CHASS
> University of Toronto
> C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302
>
> _______________________________________________
> maintainers mailing list
> maintainers at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
> .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.