[csw-maintainers] libserf, checkpkg errors, e.g. use ssl-0.9.8 instead of ssl-1.0.0
Maciej (Matchek) Bliziński
maciej at opencsw.org
Fri Aug 17 00:52:16 CEST 2012
2012/8/16 rupert THURNER <rupert at opencsw.org>
> you are right. subverison is only for solaris 10, and its fine for
> serf as well. on unstable10s it gives:
>
> # Checkpkg suggests adding the following lines to the GAR recipe:
> # This is a summary; see above for details.
>
This line right here ↑
You need to scroll up and read.
> # The following lines define a new package: CSWlibserf1-0
> PACKAGES += CSWlibserf1-0
> CATALOGNAME_CSWlibserf1-0 = libserf1_0
> PKGFILES_CSWlibserf1-0 += $(call
> baseisadirs,$(libdir),libserf-1\.so\.0\.0\.0)
> PKGFILES_CSWlibserf1-0 += $(call
> baseisadirs,$(libdir),libserf-1\.so\.0(\.\d+)*)
> SPKG_DESC_CSWlibserf1-0 += $(DESCRIPTION), libserf-1.so.0
> RUNTIME_DEP_PKGS_CSWlibserf1-1 += CSWlibserf1-0
> # The end of CSWlibserf1-0 definition
>
> why checkpkg thinks there should be a reference from 1.1 to 1.0?
>
See the comment above.
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
> > Excerpts from rupert THURNER's message of Thu Aug 16 15:18:56 -0400 2012:
> >
> >> oh .. it got cut off. unstable9s, unstable9x.
> >
> > The ssl 1.0 update was only for solaris 10. I'd suggest abandoning
> > solaris 9 for this library unless you want to add the dependency based
> > on a variable and build for both platforms separately.
> >
> > That would look something like:
> >
> > PACKAGING_PLATFORMS = solaris9-i386 solaris9-sparc solaris10-i386
> solaris10-sparc
> >
> > RUNTIME_DEP_PKGS_SunOS5.9 = CSWlibssl0-9-8
> > RUNTIME_DEP_PKGS_SunOS5.10 = CSWlibssl1-0-0
> >
> > RUNTIME_DEP_PKGS += RUNTIME_DEP_PKGS_$(GAROSREL)
> >
> > (Not checked, it might need a small tweak.)
> >
> > It's up to you whether you go this route or not though.
> >
> > Thanks
> > -Ben
> > --
> > Ben Walton
> > Systems Programmer - CHASS
> > University of Toronto
> > C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > maintainers mailing list
> > maintainers at lists.opencsw.org
> > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
> > .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
> _______________________________________________
> maintainers mailing list
> maintainers at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
> .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20120816/e436471d/attachment.html>
More information about the maintainers
mailing list