chkpkg and soname-unused

[Yann Rouillard]

Hi Rafi and slowfranklin,

Tell me how to reproduce the problem and I will have a look (for
slowfranklin, I suppose I just have to recompile tracker).
I am surprised that a patch could have such a bad side effect as screwing
the "-z ignore option" and I would prefer to dig first into the problem.

Yann


2013/11/4 Rafael Ostertag <raos at opencsw.org>

> Hi Dago
>
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 05:44:09PM +0100, Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
> > Hi Rafi,
> >
> > > Could it be related to the buildfarm update?
> >
> >
> > Probably, the T5220 is now running 105400-04 whereas unstable10x is
> still running 147441-19.
> > Should I update the x86 machines also? My impression is to patch as less
> as possible to
> > not introduce new linker symbol anomalies. The patch on the farm was
> needed to fix an ugly
> > bug in zfs which prevented us from doing backups, so no option of not
> installing ;-)
>
> If it is related to Solaris patches, patching x86 would mean that `-z
> ignore'
> might not work on x86 anymore, as well. So, wouldn't it be smarter, to
> figure
> out why it stopped working on sparc? I mean, -z ignore ain't such an
> esotheric
> switch and has been put in place for good reasons, hasn't it?
>
> cheers
> rafi
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20131104/6ed6ca16/attachment.html>