[csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs gfile

[Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski]

No dia 9 de Junho de 2010 14:24, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> escreveu:
> Excerpts from Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski's message of Wed Jun 09 09:11:54 -0400 2010:
>
>> It was /opt/csw/bin/file initially, but had to be renamed to
>> /opt/csw/bin/gfile.  We seem to follow the rule of providing gawk in
>> CSWgawk, ggrep in CSWggrep, and so on.  Now since the previous
>> CSWgfile is gone, is there any problem with providing a new one?
>
> Just confusion for the users, but maybe not enough to bother changing
> it again...I was just tossing this out there before it hits the
> streets.  Feel free to ignore.
>
> (A side thought/personal opinion of mine is that putting the g prefix
> in the filenames makes sense while putting it in the package name
> doesn't...)

I agree with that, but it's hard to decide which is more important to
follow: what makes more sense, or consistency.  Let's wait for Phil to
comment on the package name.