[csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs drill, libldns1, libldnsdevel, libunb(...)

[İhsan Doğan]

On 01/17/11 07:49 PM, Philip Brown wrote:

>> According to http://wiki.opencsw.org/packaging-shared-libraries , the
>> package name is absolutely appropriate.
>
> Ah, sorry for not being clearer. I make no arguments against the
> specific package libldns1-xxx, as per our page listed above.
> I would just let it go through right now, but unfortunately, the
> dependency issues dont make that possible at the moment
>
> I was thinking that it might be more helpful for our users to have
> some, or all, of the other stuff, associated more strongly with
> "ldns".
> specifically, the "drill" package.

Do you mean to be more exact in the package description field?




Ihsan

-- 
ihsan at dogan.ch		http://blog.dogan.ch/