[csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs drill, libldns1, libldnsdevel, libunb(...)

[Philip Brown]

On 1/26/11, İhsan Doğan <ihsan at opencsw.org> wrote:
> On 01/17/11 07:49 PM, Philip Brown wrote:
>
>> Ah, sorry for not being clearer...
>>
>> I was thinking that it might be more helpful for our users to have
>> some, or all, of the other stuff, associated more strongly with
>> "ldns".
>> specifically, the "drill" package.
>
> Do you mean to be more exact in the package description field?

actually, I was suggesting a package rename. From "drill", to either
"ldns_drill", or "ldns_utils" as some other distributions do.
What do you think about that?
Reasons being first of all, "thats what other places do", and also as
mentioned previously, that "drill" is not really recognized on its own
name. it's too generically named.