[csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs drill, libldns1, libldnsdevel, libunb(...)

[İhsan Doğan]

Am 26.01.2011 18:23, schrieb Philip Brown:

>>> I was thinking that it might be more helpful for our users to have
>>> some, or all, of the other stuff, associated more strongly with
>>> "ldns".
>>> specifically, the "drill" package.
>>
>> Do you mean to be more exact in the package description field?
> 
> actually, I was suggesting a package rename. From "drill", to either
> "ldns_drill", or "ldns_utils" as some other distributions do.
> What do you think about that?
> Reasons being first of all, "thats what other places do", and also as
> mentioned previously, that "drill" is not really recognized on its own
> name. it's too generically named.

I would prefer more ldns_drill. There might be other utilities shipped
with ldns in the future and it's probably more handy to have them separated.



Ihsan

-- 
ihsan at dogan.ch        http://blog.dogan.ch/