OpenSSL 1.0.2 transition

[Riccardo Mottola]

Hi Dago,

Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
>> >can I set something different for solaris9? or a value that suits both? I'd like to try there too but it is trying to use a compiler and a target that don't exist.
> Sure, just use
>    GARCOMPILER_5.9 = SOS12
>    GARCOMPILER_5.10 = SUS12U4
>    GARCOMPILER = $(GARCOMPILER_$(GAROSREL))

thanks, I tweaked the lts102 receipe with that - this allows a bit more 
progress on solaris 9, although build fails, read below.

I added some further small tweaks and there is now some progress to 
report, IT allows me some platform checking:

solaris 9x -> unable to finish build + i386 vs amd64 issues
solaris 9s -> build begins but fails (differently than 9x: pk11 issues)
solaris 10x -> build + test OK
solaris 10s -> build OK, test fail
solaris 11x -> build + test OK
solaris 11s -> buils OK, test fail

So my take is: the code is not SPARC safe, this means in my humble 
experience, bad code in terms of structures.. but I see no relevant 
patches in the oracle stuff.


Riccardo

PS: regarding solaris9, I see that at least for 9s the issue is pk11, I 
noticed that for the old 0.9.8 the configuration appeared optional:

# support for pkcs11 engine 
http://blogs.sun.com/chichang1/entry/how_to_integrate_pkcs11_engine
ifdef PKCS11
         PACKAGING_PLATFORMS = solaris9-sparc solaris9-i386 
solaris10-sparc solaris10-i386
ifneq ($(shell /usr/bin/uname -r),5.9)
         PATCHFILES += pkcs11_engine-0.9.8o.patch.2010-09-03
         CONFIGURE_ARGS += --pk11-libname=$(abspath 
/usr/lib/$(MM_LIBDIR)/libpkcs11.so)
endif
endif


now it is always, has pk11 known issues on solaris9 and should it be 
disabled? or am I reading this ifneq(5.9) wrong?